<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Highlight t749 Phone, Fire Orange/Red</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electronics-gadgets.info/handphone/samsung-highlight-t749-phone-fire-orangered.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electronics-gadgets.info/handphone/samsung-highlight-t749-phone-fire-orangered.html</link>
	<description>Electronics Gadget Tech News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Brandon</title>
		<link>http://electronics-gadgets.info/handphone/samsung-highlight-t749-phone-fire-orangered.html/comment-page-1#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronics-gadgets.info/handphone/samsung-highlight-t749-phone-fire-orangered.html#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>I got this phone because I broke my G1. I didn&#039;t want to shell out 400 dollars to get a new one so I asked for phones that had real web browsing. I was in love with this phone. It&#039;s cute and small compared to the G1. The on screen keyboard is actually very easy to use which was nice because I&#039;m used to a solid keyboard. It&#039;s touchscreen, which is great, is a bonus, I don&#039;t know if I could even use a phone without a touchscreen again. It&#039;s pretty easy to navigate as well. I was seriously thinking this phone was &quot;the one&quot;. Until I got online. I know that comparing this phone to a G1 is probably just asking too much anyway, but what I see on this phone I would not call real web browsing. Its like mobile web with the capability of viewing real websites in a crappy resolution. If you view a real website it starts to lag and struggle. Smartphone? probably not. I haven&#039;t used the music player but what I&#039;ve heard about playing songs in alphabetic order makes me not want to. It deeply saddens me that this phone doesn&#039;t have better music playing and web browsing capabilities. I think that does it for me though because I&#039;m paying more money a month for &quot;smartphone&quot; web browsing and this just does not qualify for me. *tears for my G1* This is just a fully touchscreen cellphone to me.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this phone because I broke my G1. I didn&#8217;t want to shell out 400 dollars to get a new one so I asked for phones that had real web browsing. I was in love with this phone. It&#8217;s cute and small compared to the G1. The on screen keyboard is actually very easy to use which was nice because I&#8217;m used to a solid keyboard. It&#8217;s touchscreen, which is great, is a bonus, I don&#8217;t know if I could even use a phone without a touchscreen again. It&#8217;s pretty easy to navigate as well. I was seriously thinking this phone was &#8220;the one&#8221;. Until I got online. I know that comparing this phone to a G1 is probably just asking too much anyway, but what I see on this phone I would not call real web browsing. Its like mobile web with the capability of viewing real websites in a crappy resolution. If you view a real website it starts to lag and struggle. Smartphone? probably not. I haven&#8217;t used the music player but what I&#8217;ve heard about playing songs in alphabetic order makes me not want to. It deeply saddens me that this phone doesn&#8217;t have better music playing and web browsing capabilities. I think that does it for me though because I&#8217;m paying more money a month for &#8220;smartphone&#8221; web browsing and this just does not qualify for me. *tears for my G1* This is just a fully touchscreen cellphone to me.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

